S. Thomas' College Old Boys' Forum  

Go Back   S. Thomas' College Old Boys' Forum > DSA Era Group

DSA Era Group 1959 to 1976, those under Wardens Davidson, Selveratnam and Annadanayagam

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-18, 05:37 PM
sriyanj sriyanj is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 37/20,Chapel Lane,Nugegoda 10250
Posts: 1,549
Default the chief of the Sri Lanka Tea Board, Dr. Rohan Pethiyagoda

TEA BOARD DETERMINED TO SPRUCE UP INDUSTRY
4 February, 2018

By Lalin Fernandopulle
Features

The tea industry regulator will go to the highest extent to spruce up the industry even to the point of shutting down factories that do not comply with standards, in order to maintain the quality of Ceylon Tea, as made clear in no uncertain terms by the chief of the Sri Lanka Tea Board, Dr. Rohan Pethiyagoda in this interview with the Sunday Observer.

Excerpts of the interview:

Q: What are your observations on the present status of the tea industry?

A: Well, 2017 was generally a good year. Production rose by about five percent and prices rose substantially more than that. But, that is not to say we should be complacent. I think production would have risen by another five to ten percent if not for the ban on weedicides. That does not sound like much in percentage terms, but it equates to some Rs 10-20 billion in national income, the bulk of which would have gone into the hands of plantation workers. So it is a substantial socio-economic hit.

We did not see much volume-growth in our value-added sector either, and I am concerned about that. The main demand from these exporters has been to be given a freer hand in importing teas for blending and re-export, and we need to consider the best way forward there, too.

For now, I think all the indicators for the tea industry are okay, though not great. But there is a lot more to be done. Most important among the threats that face us is that the production capacity of the 700 factories now in operation greatly outweighs the availability of good leaf. When the demand for leaf is so high the quality of leaf necessarily falls. This means, the quality of the tea we produce is affected, which could cut into the premium prices our teas attract in the world market. We cannot meaningfully, at least in the short term, plant more tea. This means we need to cut down on factory capacity wherever possible. My intention is that we close down factories producing sub-standard teas. They must not be allowed to pull the whole industry down with them.

Q: Are you pleased with the standards followed by the industry or are there areas that need improvement?

A: The unique selling point of our tea is our origin: Ceylon. Ceylon is reputed for the quality, character and diversity of its teas. The only one of those three that can easily be addressed is the first: quality. What does this mean? It means tea that contains less stem and stalk matter; contains low moisture; is rich in polyphenols, and so on. So that is where our primary focus must lie, but, these are threatened because of the demand for good leaf outstripping supply as a result of redundant factory capacity.

Quality also implies purity. Our tea simply must be the cleanest in the world, i.e. eliminating extraneous matter such as the grit and plastic fragments often found in teas presented to auction. It also means ensuring that all such teas contain no more than the maximum pesticide residues set by the European Union, which standard we follow in Sri Lanka. I have already put the industry on notice that any factories producing tea with unacceptably high levels of pesticides or extraneous matter will be shut down. I have given time until February, and within this month we will be testing teas from at least 100 factories monthly, and suspending the operation of any found to be substantially in excess of the limits. There will be an outcry from the affected factories, but my primary interest is not these low-quality factories but the consumer. The consumers of Ceylon Tea, whether in Sri Lanka or overseas, have a right to drink only the best and purest tea. Any factory that cannot live up to that expectation must simply be sent out of business.

Q: What are the challenges faced by the tea industry due to the Glyphosate ban and what does the future hold for the industry without a viable alternative weed killer?

A: The effects of the ban on glyphosate have been disastrous for the industry. The disaster is not just in the loss of production. Let me explain some of the other consequences.

First, the most obvious alternative, manual weeding, is not an option. Manual weeding loosens the topsoil, with the result that the loose soil simply washes into the rivers and waterways with the next rains. It results in massive soil erosion. Besides silting up our rivers and reservoirs, remember that soil takes centuries to generate and replenish. Remember also, the washing off of just 1 millimeter of topsoil per hectare equates to about 10 metric tons of soil. Just imagine the scale of the environmental disaster that results from doing this over tens of thousands of hectares.

Second, although alternatives to glyphosate certainly exist, these alternatives need first to be affordable, and second to be acceptable to tea-importing countries. You need to remember that we are competing with other major tea-exporting countries such as Kenya and India. They use glyphosate. If we resort to more expensive alternatives, how can we compete? Our tea already incurs, per kilo, more than twice the production cost as theirs. This would simply put us out of business.

Another issue with resorting to alternatives is persuading tea-importing countries to accept residues of these alternatives in the tea we export. This is a long, slow process. I was in Japan last week, to negotiate these residue levels with their authorities, and the least-time they require for testing and approving a new herbicide in tea is four years. However, our government banned glyphosate overnight and for no valid reason. So we shouldn’t think that alternatives can be used just like that.

Finally, in the absence of approved alternatives, what do tea growers do? They resort to unapproved alternatives. This again spells disaster because the chemical residues permissible in tea have been carefully negotiated with the governments of importing countries over a matter of decades. If they suddenly find some unauthorized substance in our tea, they will simply ban our tea imports. So, while I am sympathetic to the tea producers for the predicament they are in, I have made it clear that if I caught them adding unacceptable levels of alternatives, or any alternatives not approved by the Tea Research Institute, I will immediately shut them down. We cannot risk a national calamity. It is worth reflecting on the reasons why glyphosate gets such a bad press. After all, it is the world’s most accepted weedicide. All other tea-producing countries use it. And no country in the world has yet banned food imports containing glyphosate residues. In Japan, for example, the maximum residue limit allowed for glyphosate is 100 times higher than that allowed for the most commonly used alternative, MCPA.

Q: Conclusion? Glyphosate is safe. So why the fear?

A: I suspect the origin of this problem stems from the fact that most of the world’s genetically-engineered (GE) crops are designed to be resistant to glyphosate. That way, farmers can liberally spray their fields of GE soy, maize or cotton without killing the crop-plant. This technology was pioneered by Monsanto, a multinational corporation. Now, many western “green” NGOs and the green political movements they support, are opposed to GE crops. This is a ‘political’ philosophy, rather like the organic-food philosophy, not one founded on science. Americans have been eating GE foods for a generation now and they aren’t dying like flies or glowing in the dark. But, in countries such as Germany, green political parties command huge influence because they control the balance of political power in coalition governments, failing which they certainly have the ear of their constituents. Hence, the propaganda.

The tragedy in Sri Lanka was that the government uncritically fell into the trap of believing the propaganda rather than the science. We have very competent institutions responsible for regulating our health and agriculture. We now live in much greater prosperity and better health thanks to them: the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health. Don’t forget that Sri Lankans are living 30 years longer now than they did in the pre-pesticide era. But the Registrar of Pesticides, the Director General of Agriculture, the Director of Tea Research, the Director of Medical Research, the National Academy of Sciences and so on were never consulted when the government banned glyphosate.

All this leaves the poor Sri Lanka Tea Board fighting what looks like a hopeless battle, but we will plod on and do the best we can under the circumstances.




the chief of the Sri Lanka Tea Board, Dr. Rohan Pethiyagoda
Attached Images
File Type: jpg z_p23-Tea.jpg (33.5 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-18, 05:46 PM
sriyanj sriyanj is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 37/20,Chapel Lane,Nugegoda 10250
Posts: 1,549
Default Board not pleased with growth in value-added exports : Tea industry: Regulator to pay

BOARD NOT PLEASED WITH GROWTH IN VALUE-ADDED EXPORTS : TEA INDUSTRY: REGULATOR TO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO QUALITY

Weedicide ban caused a loss of around Rs 10-20b | Alternatives need to be affordable
4 February, 2018

By Lalin Fernandopulle
Business

Last year (2017), was a fairly good year for the tea industry but it could have been much better if not for the glyphosate ban which resulted in a revenue loss of around Rs.10-20 billion from production, Sri Lanka Tea Board Chairman Rohan Pethiyagoda said.

He said production increased by around five percent and prices rose substantially above that in the past year. However, by no means should the industry be complacent about it since it could have increased production at least by another five percent.

“The ban on the weed killer has been disastrous for the industry. The disaster is not just in terms of loss of production which is the least of my worries but it is also in terms of loss of income which would have gone into the hands of plantation workers,” Pethiyagoda said.

He said the most obvious alternative, manual weeding, is simply not an option. Manual weeding loosens the topsoil which results in the loose soil being washed into rivers and waterways at the next rain, triggering soil erosion.

“Alternatives to Glyphosate certainly exist but they need to be affordable and acceptable to tea-importing countries. We are competing with major tea-exporting countries such as Kenya and India which use glyphosate. If we resort to costly alternatives we will not be able to compete in the global market as already are cost of production is higher than these countries,’ the Tea Board chief said. Another issue in resorting to alternatives according to Pethiyagoda is that the industry will have to persuade tea importing countries to accept residues of the alternatives in the tea we export which is a slow and long process.

However, with regard to exports, the Tea Board is not pleased with the quantum of growth in value added exports.

“We did not see much volume-growth in our value-added sector. The main demand from exporters is to give them a freer hand to import teas for blending and re-export. The SLTB will need to consider the best way for it,” Pethiyagoda said.

The industry regulator will pay greater attention to the maintenance of quality which is a hallmark of Ceylon Tea. The Tea Board Chief backed by the Plantation Industries Minister said tough measures will be taken to spruce up the industry from mal practices to maintain quality of Ceylon Tea.

“I have already put the industry on notice that any factory producing tea with unacceptably high levels of pesticides or extraneous matter will be shut down.

I have given time until February, and within this month we will be testing teas from at least 100 factories monthly and suspending the operation of any that are found to be substantially in excess of the limits,” Pethiyagoda said.


Rohan Pethiyagoda
Attached Images
File Type: jpg z_p33-Tea.jpg (33.9 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +6. The time now is 12:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website copyright 2011 - Ozlanka